Eng deiscrti

8D CONCERN & COUNTERMEASURE REPORT SUMMARY Supplier Name & Code Pierburg S.A. Part Name LHS EGR Valve M4900438 (7.01881.04.0) Part No. 1. Concern Details Description (include photograph or sketch): Completed by Romero Position Plant Quality Date 10/10/2011 Approved by Nuño Position Quality Manager Date 10/10/2011 Team members: Munarriz SQA Status: 01/12/2011 ICP-PT126/11 n/a 06/10/2011 Ford Lion LHS 1 n/a Y N

Issue: BW informed in 06/10/2011 about a valve with electric fail in Ford. Ford notified in 27/10/2011, EGR 'C' sensor circuit failure. The valve passed cold test at DEP, then failed on rolling road in a built vehicle at Landrover.

Report No. Rank Incident Date & Time Model Quantity Affected Affected Lot No's. Recurrence

2. Similar Part Consideration Can the concern appear on other parts? Yes Consider: - Other models - Generic parts - Other colours - Opposite hand - Front / Rear - Other (please state):

No x x x x x x Yes No x x x x

Comment / Result

3. Initial Analysis Where should the non-conforming parts have been detected? - During process / manufacture? - After manufacture (e.g. Final Inspection) - Prior to dispatch - Other (please state):

Reason for non-detection

4. Temporary Countermeasures - Immediate Action What actions have been taken to prevent the delivery of reject parts to customer plants? Actions Taken Consider: n/a - Work in progress - Stores stock n/a - Warehouse stock n/a - Service parts n/a - Other (please state): n/a Temporary Countermeasure Details: In serial production all the EGR valves are 100% functionally tested, following drawing defined checks. Calibration and verification station of the line acts as a poka-yoke with the evidence of mechanical dot on the part.

Qty. OK Qty. NG

% Effective

Delivery Date for 1st OK parts n/a after temporary countermeasure Delivery Ref. for 1st OK parts n/a after temporary countermeasure How are OK parts identified?
Automatic conformity dot in the aluminum housing

5. Final Analysis 5 WHY