Telling feminist stories
Clare Hemmings Feminist Theory 2005; 6; 115 DOI: 10.1177/1464700105053690 The online version of this article can be found at: http://fty.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/6/2/115
Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Feminist Theory can be found at: Email Alerts: http://fty.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://fty.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations (this article cites 10 articles hosted on the SAGE Journals Online and HighWire Press platforms): http://fty.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/6/2/115
Downloaded from http://fty.sagepub.com at CORNELL UNIV on October 26, 2007 © 2005 SAGE Publications. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized distribution.
115
Telling feminist stories
F T
Feminist Theory Copyright © 2005 SAGE Publications (London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi) vol. 6(2): 115–139. 1464–7001 DOI: 10.1177/1464700105053690 www.sagepublications.com
Clare Hemmings London School of Economics
Abstract This article identifies and analyses the dominant stories that academics tell about the development of Western second wave feminist theory. Through an examination of recent production of interdisciplinary feminist and cultural theory journals, I suggest that despite a rhetorical insistence on multiple feminisms, Western feminist trajectories emerge as startlingly singular. In particular, I am critical of an insistent narrative that sees the development of feminist thought as a relentless march of progress or loss. This dominant approach oversimplifies the complex history of Western feminisms, fixes writers and perspectives within a particular decade, and repeatedly (and erroneously) positions poststructuralist feminists as ‘the first’ to challenge the category ‘woman’ as the subject and object